Simpleium

大家會犯上沉沒成本偏誤嗎? (sunk cost basis) 誤以為技術分析適合自己，即使在已經付出代價的事情投入更多，面對虧蝕，而不是改變自己的投資風格。

除了沉沒成本偏誤外，大家可能決策上犯上光環效應(Halo effect)? 投資者對產品/公司的認知和判斷往往只從局部出發，擴散而得出整體印象，即是常常以既定印象概全。
例子1) 行李箱市場領導者: 新秀麗品牌一定好?
例子2) 投資股票當然跟香港首富李嘉誠 ; 台灣當然是明星股:台積電

現在資料濫泛年代，有些自媒體聲稱教導初學者投資理財，但是投資理財能力/實力如何? 一般做法通常在youtube 分享最新公司消息例如台積電，希望可以賺取網絡上的流量。
希望你們成為其粉絲，有些透過patreon經營收費項目。專家的意見可以參考，不過，你們會否過份依賴所謂「專家」的意見?
大家想知道行李箱的生意模式嗎?

Will everyone commit the sunk cost bias? (Sunk cost basis) Many of you believe that technical analysis is suitable for you, even if you invest more in things that have already paid the price, you will face losses instead of changing your investment style.

In addition to the sunk cost bias, may people suffer from the halo effect in decision-making? Investors’ understanding and judgment of a product/company often only start from the local part and spread to form an overall impression, that is, they often use the established impression to summarize.
Example 1) Luggage market leader, Samsonite : if the brand sounds good?
Example 2) Invest in stocks with Li Ka-shing, the richest man in Hong Kong, of course; Taiwan’s star stock: TSMC

In today’s era of overflowing information, some self-media claim to teach beginners about investment and financial management, but what is their investment and financial management ability/strength? The general practice is to share the latest company news such as TSMC on YouTube, hoping to earn traffic on the Internet.
I hope you will become its fans. Some of them operate paid projects through patreon. You can refer to the opinions of experts, but will you rely too much on the opinions of so-called “experts"?
Do you want to know the business model of luggage?